A business can develop a product that solves a genuine customer problem, articulate its benefits and build a convincing value proposition. But none of this, on its own, establishes that there is a viable business to build. Are enough customers willing to pay for the solution? Will they choose it over the alternatives? Can we reach and serve them at a price that makes the economics work?
The distinction matters because a value proposition is often treated as if it were the business case: identify a customer need, explain how the product meets it, and assume the market will respond. But demonstrating that a product can create value is not the same as establishing that customers will buy it, or that serving them can generate a sustainable return. The proposition should help us build and test that case, not stand in for it.
From solving a problem to creating a reason to choose
Knowing that a product solves a customer problem is an important starting point, but it tells us little about whether our offer will win business. Customers already have ways of dealing with the problem, whether through another supplier, an internal workaround or simply accepting the status quo. We need to understand not just what they need, but what would make our solution sufficiently valuable to justify choosing it.
The challenge is to turn what we know about customers into a set of choices about the business.
The answers should influence more than how we describe the product. They should help determine what we develop, where we focus our resources and how we choose to compete.
This is the distinction Anderson, J. C., Narus, J. A. and van Rossum, W. (2006) make in Harvard Business Review: a strong customer value proposition concentrates on the few elements of value that matter most to the target customer and demonstrates their worth, rather than presenting a long list of benefits.. The commercial task is not simply to articulate why an offer is attractive, but to establish where the business can create distinctive value, prove it and build a viable offer around it.
Turning insight into commercial choices
Understanding customers, competitors and the wider market only creates value when it influences the decisions a business makes. Customer insight helps us understand what matters to different groups, the problems they need to solve and the circumstances in which they might act. Competitor and market insight reveal the alternatives available, the expectations already established and where there may be an opportunity to offer something meaningfully different.
The critical step is identifying which difference is most likely to influence customer choice. A product can have many advantages, but not all will matter equally to the people we want to serve. The most commercially valuable differentiator is not necessarily the most innovative feature or the one the business is proudest of. It is the one that addresses something important to the target customer and gives them a credible reason to choose us over the alternatives, including doing nothing.
This is where positioning becomes a strategic tool. It brings customer, competitor and market insight together to establish who the business should serve, what it should offer them and why they should choose it. The resulting proposition is not simply a message to communicate; it is a basis for making decisions across the business.
If our customer values reduced risk more than bells and whistles, then that should determine product design, the evidence we provide, how we sell and the support we offer. If price is a barrier, we need to understand whether the issue is affordability, uncertainty about the return or a lack of perceived difference. Each points towards a different response.
The aim is not to find a differentiator and then build a story around it. It is to use what we know about the market to identify the difference that matters, establish why customers should believe our claims and determine how the business can deliver on them.
From positioning to a business case
Once we understand the customer, the market and the differentiator that can influence choice, we have a stronger basis for building the business case.
This insight should inform the product we develop, the price we charge, how we reach and communicate with customers, and how we sell and deliver the offer. These decisions need to work together. A proposition that promises simplicity, for example, is undermined by a complicated buying process or an implementation that demands too much effort from the customer.
Each decision has financial consequences. The price customers are prepared to pay affects revenue potential; the channels needed to reach them affect acquisition costs; and the support required affects delivery costs, capacity and margin. The business case must reflect the reality of serving the chosen market, not simply the potential demand for the product.
For an SME, this discipline matters. Resources are limited, and developing a product, entering a market or building sales capability can be costly. Positioning helps make the assumptions explicit: which customers are most likely to buy, what will persuade them, what it will take to reach them and whether the economics make sense.
These are hypotheses, not facts. They need to be tested with customers and refined as evidence emerges. If the differentiator does not influence choice, the business may need to reconsider its target market, offer or basis for competing. If customers value the offer but will not pay enough to support profitable delivery, the operating model may need to change — or the opportunity may not be viable.
This is why marketing needs to influence the business before it influences communications. The decisions about what to offer, whom to serve and how to compete should precede the decisions about how to promote it.
A starting point, not the finished answer
Frameworks that connect customer needs with product benefits can help teams look beyond features towards customer outcomes. The risk comes when the framework is mistaken for the answer.
Strategyzer’s (2026) Value Proposition Canvas provides a practical way to map customer jobs, pains and gains against an offer. But completing the canvas does not establish that customers will choose the offer or that the business can deliver it profitably. The proposed fit still needs to be tested against evidence.
A persuasive proposition can leave essential questions unanswered.
Without answers, a well-articulated proposition can create confidence without reducing commercial risk. Linking a problem to a solution is not the same as validating that customers will choose it.
This is particularly important in B2B. The person experiencing the problem may not control the budget; the decision-maker may weigh different risks, while operational teams worry about implementation. As we’ve previously explored, understanding the wider buying group matters, not just the main contact. McKinsey’s research (2015) on B2B purchasing explores this complexity and the need to understand how business customers actually make decisions.
The objective is not to eliminate uncertainty, but to avoid mistaking a plausible explanation of customer value for evidence of a viable market opportunity. Customer behaviour, sales conversations and the reasons behind won and lost opportunities should help test and refine the positioning, offer and business model.
Ultimately, the value of a proposition lies in what it helps a business understand and decide. It should provide a clear basis for choosing whom to serve, how to differentiate and what to build — while helping establish whether the opportunity can support a sustainable, profitable business.
Even when those choices are well founded, there can still be a gap between a customer recognising the value and deciding to buy. That is where we turn next, to the barriers between interest and action.
Whether you need a next quarter growth programme, support to launch, or experienced leadership at the table, driveBM helps you build, deliver, and grow with confidence.
Schedule a 30-minute triage call and let’s get to work!
